

Does Trauma Designation Matter? Post-Return of Spontaneous Circulation Outcomes After Pediatric Nontraumatic Cardiac Arrest
Wednesday, May 20, 2026 4:24 PM to 4:32 PM · 8 min. (America/New_York)
International Hall 10: Level I
Abstracts
Pediatrics
Information
Number
670
Background and Objectives
Despite advances in pediatric resuscitation, survival and neurological outcomes after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) remain variable. While differences between in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are well described, the impact of emergency department (ED) trauma designation on post-ROSC stabilization and short-term outcomes is unknown. Trauma centers may offer greater access to critical care resources and coordinated resuscitation, potentially improving outcomes for children with non-traumatic cardiac arrest. This study compared physiologic stabilization, seven-day survival, and neurological outcomes among pediatric patients achieving ROSC after non-traumatic cardiac arrest treated at trauma-designated versus non-trauma pediatric EDs.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients ≤18 years with non-traumatic cardiac arrest who achieved ROSC in the prehospital or ED setting between January 2014 and December 2023 across two freestanding children’s hospitals: one trauma designated and one non-trauma. Primary outcomes were seven-day survival and neurological status at discharge. Secondary outcomes included trends in blood pressure, temperature, and glucose during the first 72 hours post-ROSC. Statistical comparisons utilized Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests (two-sided, p< 0.05).
Results
Sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria (trauma n=45; non-trauma n=18). Median age was 3.1 years; 52% were male, and respiratory etiology accounted for 83% of cardiac arrests. Seven-day survival did not differ between trauma and non-trauma centers (55.6% vs 55.6%, p=1.00). Neurological outcomes were similar, with no new deficits in 64% of trauma and 50% of non-trauma patients (p=0.66). Physiologic parameters were comparable except for higher glucose levels at 12–24 hours post-ROSC in the non-trauma cohort (181mg/dL vs 132 mg/dL, p=0.009).
Conclusion
In this dual-center cohort of pediatric non-traumatic cardiac arrests with ROSC, trauma designation was not associated with differences in early survival or neurological recovery. Both center types achieved similar post-resuscitation stabilization, suggesting that resuscitation protocols and team readiness may influence outcomes more than trauma designation alone. Larger multicenter studies are needed to assess potential long-term differences.
CPE
0
CME
1.25
Disclosures
Access the following link to view disclosures of session presenters, presenting authors, organizers, moderators, and planners: