

Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Placement Practices: A National Survey of Gel Use
Wednesday, May 20, 2026 12:40 PM to 12:48 PM · 8 min. (America/New_York)
International Hall 8: Level I
Abstracts
Ultrasound
Information
Number
452
Background and Objectives
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used to place ultrasounded-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (US-PIV) in patients with difficult vascular access. In May 2025, the Department of Public Health (DPH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a national warning regarding growth of Paraburkholderia fungorum in non-sterile ultrasound gel products and recommended sterile ultrasound gel for all percutaneous procedures. The primary study aim was to determine the percentage of emergency departments (EDs) making changes to their US-PIV gel or policies in response to this recommendation.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional, national survey of ultrasound guided PIV use in EDs taking place between 8/14/2025 and 9/31/2025. Inclusion criteria was survey response, with duplicate responses excluded. A 15-question survey was sent to the ACEP ultrasound section (1,650 members), the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Academy of Emergency Ultrasound (AEUS) (559 members), and the Society of Clinical Ultrasound Fellowships (SCUF) (700 members), with two reminder emails.
Results
The survey received 175 responses, with 143 unique institutional responses, used for statistical analysis. An ED policy for US-PIV was reported at 107 institutions (74.8%), whereas 29 (20.3%) reported no policy, and 7 (4.9%) respondents did not know whether such a policy existed. After the CDC notice, no change in ED US-PIV policy was made at 94 (87.9%) of the responding institutions, however, 68 (72.3%) of the 94 institutions reporting no changes already recommended sterile gel for US-PIV in the policy. Of the 34 (23.8%) institutions who reported making changes, 31 changed gel to a sterile product for US-PIV, 3 changed their ED US-PIV policy. A total of 11 sites reported unknown changes, with 6 of those sites having an ED US-PIV policy and 6 using sterile gel for US-PIV. Four sites reported no changes but an emphasis on using sterile gel for US-PIV. Common themes from narrative comments included a shift towards sterile gel, inconsistent adherence to existing guidelines, and practical barriers to change.
Conclusion
Our survey determined that among the 143 institutions, approximately 75% had an ED policy for US-PIV. The CDC notice resulted in one in five institutions making changes to their gel, with anecdotal reports of varying compliance by staff. The survey results suggest room for continued improvement.
CPE
0
CME
0.75
Disclosures
Access the following link to view disclosures of session presenters, presenting authors, organizers, moderators, and planners:
Moderator
KA
Kenton Anderson
MDStanfordPresenting Author

Zachary Boivin
MDYale-New Haven Medical Center