Impact of an Emergency Department–Based Critical Care Unit on Evaluation and Treatment of Sepsis

Impact of an Emergency Department–Based Critical Care Unit on Evaluation and Treatment of Sepsis

Wednesday, May 20, 2026 8:00 AM to 8:08 AM · 8 min. (America/New_York)
L506 - L507: Level L
Abstracts
Critical Care/Resuscitation

Information

Abstract Number
327
Background and Objectives
Timely evaluation and treatment of patients with sepsis has been associated with a decrease in mortality. An emergency department-based critical care and resuscitation unit (CCRU), a novel model in which critical care staffing and equipment is embedded within the ED, may help facilitate timely care for the most time-sensitive clinical presentations. We analyzed our academic medical center’s experience caring for septic patients in our recently created CCRU.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients presenting to our center 1/2022 – 4/2024 who met sepsis criteria at triage based on SIRS criteria. Patients were divided into two cohorts, those presenting in the year preceding CCRU implementation (pre-CCRU) and those presenting in the year after implementation (post-CCRU). Patient data was collected from our ED electronic health record (EHR). The primary outcomes of interest were: time to evaluation (blood culture and lactate collection) and treatment (fluid resuscitation and antibiotic initiation). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients in the post-CCRU cohort who were triaged to the CCRU (CCRU-triage) vs those triaged to other areas (Main Bay-triage).
Results
Compared to the Pre-CCRU cohort (n=1784), earlier blood culture collection (mean 2.6 vs 2.1 hours, p=0.008) and earlier treatment with fluids (2.6 vs 2.3 hours, p=0.021) and antibiotics (4.0 vs 3.1 hours, p<0.001) occurred in the Post-CCRU cohort (n=1761). There was no difference in time to lactate collection or in-hospital mortality. CCRU-triage patients (n=758) were older (60.0 vs 52.4 years, p<0.001) and had higher rates of several comorbidities including diabetes, heart failure, and obesity compared to Main Bay-triage patients (n=1003). CCRU-triage was associated with earlier blood culture (1.4 vs 3.1 hours, p<0.001) and lactate (0.7 vs 2.7 hours, p<.001) collection and earlier antibiotic administration (2.2 vs 4.5 hours, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher among ED-CCRU patients compared to Main Bay-Triage patients (.07% vs .01%, p<.001).
Conclusion
ED-CCRU implementation was associated with more expedient evaluation and treatment of septic patients as measured by key markers associated with sepsis best-practice care. Triage to the CCRU was associated with higher in hospital mortality, likely reflecting that CCRU patients tended to be older and had more comorbidities at baseline.
CME
0.75

Disclosures

Access the following link to view disclosures of session presenters, presenting authors, organizers, moderators, and planners:

Log in

See all the content and easy-to-use features by logging in or registering!